Ostensible authority is the power of an agent to legally bind its principal with a third party, where the agent does not have the actual authority of the principal to bind the principal in the circumstances. The authority to bind the principal is “ostensible”, because it is perception of the third party in respect of the apparent power of the agent which binds the principal.
When an agent holds themselves out as a having authority to other businesses or the world at large and does not inform the third party of a limitation of the actual authority to third parties, the principal may be bound as a result of the ostensible authority represented by the agent to the third party.
The holding out is satisfied by appointing a person to a particular position within a company particular office or by producing him with the indications of authority, such as letterhead, notepaper, business cards, email footer, knowing that the agent is purporting to represent the company. All these involve the company permitting the agent to purport to act on behalf of the principal entity, such as a company, a partnership, joint venture or association.
In Freeman & Lockyer v Buckhurst Park Properties (1964) Diplock LJ in explained the requirements for ostensible authority arise:
Cases commonly arise where:
Ostensible authority does not arise where the person alleging that he relied on the representation knows that the agent's authority is limited so as to exclude entering into transactions of the type in question, and so cannot have relied on any contrary representation by the principal: Russo-Chinese Bank v. Li Yau Sam [1910] AC 174.
The agent is liable to the principal for exceeding their power, as it is a breach of contract to exceed one’s authority to act for another. The third party is not bound by the principal unless the principal ratifies the contract.
Directors
Directors of companies are in a special position in respect of the affairs of the companies to which they are appointed. A presumption arises whereby the director is presumed to have power to bind the company where the third party acts in good faith. The members and the company are entitled to obtain injunctions to prevent those without actual authority from holding themselves out as having authority to do so.
Transactions entered by a company are voidable at the option of the company except where:
Where directors exceed their authority, they are liable to pay to the company for any gain made directly or indirectly by the transaction, and to indemnify the company for any loss or damage resulting from the transaction.
Ostensible authority may continue after actual authority has terminated and the principal has revoked the actual authority of the agent. This continuation of power to bind the principal may arise where a third party has acted in good faith on prior conduct and does not have notice of the termination of the actual authority of the agent.
It might be that the Director of Sales has no authority to sign any document on behalf of the company, or the Director of Sales has actual power to sign a specified class of documents (such as purchase orders up to a value of £1,000 but not more than £1,000) and exceeds their authority. Instances of a person having ostensible power takes place include:
For legal advice and more information on liability of companies for commercial agents and taking steps to avoid joint and several liability, contact us online or call 020 7353 1770.