The contracts used by a business should fit into the company’s model for doing business, not dictate how the business does business. Is the traditional approach to commercial contracts still fit for purpose in the 21st Century? We discuss how a more modern approach can save time, money and energy when it comes to negotiating your next contract.
Commercial relationships are built on trust, not contracts. It follows that commercial contracts should not be a labyrinth of complicated legal jargon. Well drafted contracts should suit the specific requirements of a business and reduce the time and money spent on contractual negotiations.
The focus should be on bringing in revenue with a minimum of fuss. When contracts are properly structured, negotiations can be focussed on the work itself rather than the paper-work which represents it.
Standard terms of business which are not fit for purpose, especially those ‘borrowed’ from similar enterprises, can cause endless problems, particularly when negotiations are expected as part of the contract process, such as in the professional services sector.
There is no need for time consuming extended negotiations when the suppliers of professional services and customised goods have got the right balance in their commercial contracts. The basic steps to conclude a deal are usually as follows:-
Lengthy and time-consuming reviews and negotiations should be a signal that a contract is not fit for purpose. Significant time and expense must be incurred for business people to feel assured that the contract will do the job.
In the majority of cases, contract reviews and audits should be focussed and with a narrow brief on specific issues. Time wasted on your own contractual documentation could have been spent retaining the next customer.
Traditional - or 20th century - contracts usually commence with the names of the parties, followed by recitals, operative provisions, testimonium and execution clauses. Any schedules and annexures appear after the execution page.
Beautiful documents if you're into that kind of thing, but are they required or necessary and, more importantly, fit for their commercial purpose?
Contracts are structured in this way to encourage the parties to read the whole contract before reaching the dotted line, which might be 15 pages into the document.
There are several problems with this traditional approach to commercial contracts:-
The law allows a flexible approach to reach legally binding agreements. Restructuring business contracts should not be an onerous task but it is one which needs to be performed with care.
Break out variable factors into an Order Form and remove them from the body of the contract. These will include:
What would otherwise be contained in schedules at the back of the Contract can be attached to the Order Form. These attachments should include legal obligations which vary from deal to deal, such as:-
This is where it comes together. The standard terms of business are drafted with the contents of the order form and schedules to the Order in mind. It is drafted in a way where the terms do not change and do not need to be changed, other than in extreme cases.
With a bit of knowledge on what to avoid outing into sales proposals, proposals for professional services can easily be fitted into this structure.
The theory applies to contracts used by businesses across all sectors of business. There is no industry or sector which cannot benefit from the exercise to improve their contract lifecycle from completion of the sale to completion of the formal legal terms.
Setting up a streamlined and focussed process for addressing specific issues will dramatically reduce the time spent negotiating, amending and taking advice on draft agreements.
If your contracts have already been prepared by a specialist solicitor, chances are that it will simply be a question of structure, not content. The time and cost required to do this is likely to be a fraction of the cost of re-drafting the agreement from scratch.
In the long run, the benefits of shortening your sales contract lifecycle will be realised again, and again and again.
The following tips might be helpful:
This process will highlight problem areas. Start by focussing on contract provisions which are most frequently contested, and work your way back. Consider introducing KPIs to measure the time it takes to negotiate different elements of the contract in future negotiations.
If your commercial contracts are causing more trouble than they are worth, call Leigh Ellis on 020 7353 1770. He has been structuring contracts to streamline business for repeat use for years.
For business legal advice and more information on making better contract documentation for sales and contract management audits, contact us online or call us on 020 7353 1770.